At 02:05 PM 7/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >> there are circa 240 top level domains..... and inlcuding many >> not in the current rootservers. > >If they are not in the current root servers, they are not top level >domains. They are private domains. Not true. A top level domain is a functional level of the DNS. If it is not in the commonsly used root servers, it *may* be viewed as private from *their* perspective, but it they are still at the top level. > >> ICANN has ar ticially and narrowly >> defined this one such that NSI is the only qualified constituent. > >Nonsense. There is an entire ccTLD constituency. > Yes, but the ccTLD Constituency is NOT included in the gTLD Registry constituency. >-- >Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be >[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain > > Gene Marsh ++++++++++ Gene Marsh Rogue network propeller-head
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Personal attacks Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Personal attacks Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functions as... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functions as... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus A.M. Rutkowski
- [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consen... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gordon Cook
- [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Bill Lovell
- [Special Attention to Jay Fenello and Congressman Tom ... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Bill Lovell
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Jeff Williams
