At 01:12 PM 7/11/99 -0400, you wrote: >...ICANN has no business >worrying about national defense and highway construction, and would have no >legitimacy attempting to make policy in those areas; it does need >legitimacy with respect to the sorts of functions the White Paper laid out. > I would reword this to a more appropriate view of the current situation, to read: "...it does need respect as to the legitimacy of the sorts of functions the White Paper laid out." That respect has yet to be earned. Gene Marsh ++++++++++ ++++++++++ Gene Marsh president, anycastNET Incorporated 330-699-8106
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constit... William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTL... Jay Fenello
- [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. cons... Kent Crispin
- [IFWP] Re: ICANN functions as c... Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functi... Jay Fenello
