Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN functions as corp, gov't, or hybrid

[Diane Cabell]

Gene Marsh wrote:

> At 02:13 PM 7/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >Governments already have authority to look into ICANN's operations.  There is
> >nothing about being a corporation that keeps off limits.
>
> Yes, Diane, but an organization in which we are being asked to trust and
> invest our future may need its own processes which INVITE scrutiny.  This
> would be a policy, not a mandate based on the type of organization.  The
> subtle difference brings a more open approach and engenders a higher level
> of trust.

What do you have in mind, Gene?  Exactly what would a government official do?
Just watch?  Make recommendations?  Why a government official? Is that because
they are presumed to be representative of their nation?  Which government
official?  The FCC? Congress?  The European Commission?

IMHO, just opening the Board meetings would be sufficient.  If any government
official wants to attend, let 'em.

> I see no such enlightened approach from ICANN to date.

Well, there's that GAC, but there aren't many people on this list who are enamored
of it.

Diane Cabell
http://www.mama-tech.com
Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
Boston, MA