On 15 July 1999, Diane Cabell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Further, ICANN isn't a government with guns to enforce such a policy. If such >a decision was intolerable to the greater number of the constituents having to >pay it, would it really fly at all? Oh, we will get a choice? I was under the impression it would be passed on by the registrars, and therefore be made part of the contract between DN owner and registrar. Thus, it's not an optional thing. -- Mark C. Langston Let your voice be heard: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.idno.org Systems Admin http://www.icann.org San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org
- [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajorities Kerry Miller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajorities Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajoritie... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajoritie... Eric Weisberg
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajorities Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajorities Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajoritie... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajoritie... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & supermajori... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & superma... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & su... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership & su... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership &... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership ... Jay Fenello
- Re[2]: [IFWP] Re: Membersh... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership ... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Membership ... Jeff Williams
