At 06:03 AM 7/16/99 -0400, Joe Sims wrote:
>significant funds soon are not good. There is a serious catch-22 here
>that for some ICANN critics is probably not coincidental: complain about
>the lack of an elected Board, and simultaneously make it impossible to
>generate the funds to elect a truly representative Board.
How was the process for technical coordination of Usenet names funded ?
Where did the money to coordinate the technicalities of Apache, Linux, *BSD,
mysql and so on and so forth, funded ?
Seemingly all the money in the (Microsoft) world combined with
all Of Netscape's skills can't make better webserver software
that the Apache project which still dominates market and mindshare.
In other words, full house of clues beats two aces anyday.
Thanks for letting us know you have no idea how to do this.
--
Richard Sexton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone
http://killifish.vrx.net http://www.mbz.org http://lists.aquaria.net
Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada, 70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD +1 (613) 473-1719
