RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws

[R . Gaetano]

Gene,

You wrote:
> 
> Yes, but you adroitly miss addressing the other issue...  
> Richard Sexton
> also brought up the question of additional gTLD DNSO NC 
> representatives.
> That issue has never been properly addressed.
> 

True, but the purpose of my post was not to give a comprehensive summary of
the Berlin meeting, but only to answer to Joop mentioning when the attendees
showed agreement with the limitation to 1 seat for NSI.

Regards
Roberto