At 10:19 AM 8/9/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >BTW, I know that the complaints Ken and Richard Lindsay (among others) made >were real, as at that time I was a member of CORE and participated to the >testbed. Roberto, I think we both observed these developments. It's not apparent that anyone has suggested there were no "real" problems. Real systems developments tend to have such problems. What's been bothersome is how the NDA - which was meant to protect all testbed participants against snipping public remarks - has been used against NSI, with constant innuendos that all problems arose only from NSI, and that somehow NSI wasn't responsive, when this plainly was not the case. --tony
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... Michael Froomkin
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICA... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... Gene Marsh
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... Gene Marsh
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... R . Gaetano
- [IFWP] RE: The scope of NDAs A.M. Rutkowski
- [IFWP] RE: The scope of NDAs Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICA... Werner Staub
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... Ivan Pope
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's... A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's byla... cgomes
