Re: Re[2]: [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN Santiago real video feed (fwd)

[Planet Communications Computing Facility]

On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:

> > I think your way ahead of us here been.  Were not there yet - i.e.
> > protest.  As I have said before we have no protest at this time.  Were
> > just gathering opinion, and thank you for your support of the policy
> > stated.
> 
> My response was not directed at you, it was directed at those whom you
> asked "if they should have any concerns respecting the ICANN's
> position on video feeds" and I was addressing why, even if they found
> it somewhat more restrictive than they might normally like or want in
> an ideal circumstance, they might want to take certain things into
> account before responding with any critical concerns.

Were concerned with privacy law.  Irrespective of ICANN's identification
as a body corporate - non profit - it is being interpreted by us in law as
a near government organization (NGO) for this planet, and with that
responsibility go issues in law - privacy is just one.  Issues shared by
government.  Do yoou understand the implications?

Regards
Jeff Mason

--
Planet Communication & Computing Facility           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Access Internet Research Publisher           1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033