Sunday, August 22, 1999, 3:50:48 AM, Planet Communications Computing Facility
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>> > I think your way ahead of us here been. Were not there yet - i.e.
>> > protest. As I have said before we have no protest at this time. Were
>> > just gathering opinion, and thank you for your support of the policy
>> > stated.
>>
>> My response was not directed at you, it was directed at those whom you
>> asked "if they should have any concerns respecting the ICANN's
>> position on video feeds" and I was addressing why, even if they found
>> it somewhat more restrictive than they might normally like or want in
>> an ideal circumstance, they might want to take certain things into
>> account before responding with any critical concerns.
> Were concerned with privacy law. Irrespective of ICANN's identification
> as a body corporate - non profit - it is being interpreted by us in law as
> a near government organization (NGO) for this planet, and with that
> responsibility go issues in law - privacy is just one. Issues shared by
> government. Do yoou understand the implications?
What I understand is when I see a criticism being made for the sake of
having one more thing to criticize, rather than focusing on the
substance of the issues.
--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org
