And the IP constituency has *invited* individual members.

Esther

At 09:31 pm 09/01/1999 +0900, Adam Peake wrote:
>Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>> > That's why I was in favour of financing ICANN in a different way, like for
>> > instance with a $1 fee on domain names, or with a membership fee.
>>
>> I'd be happy to pay the $1/name tax if I had a voice in the making of the
>> policies of the Domain Name System or IP address allocation.
>>
>> But I don't.
>>
>> There is no constituency of the DNSO that allows individuals who have
>> domain names to be members.
>>
>
>Karl, have you tried to join the non commercial constituency?
>
>And anyone know if the commercial constituency has rejected any
>applications from individual domain name holders?
>
>Adam
>
>> The DNSO General Assembly and Working Groups are being used by the DNSO
>> Names Council as clerical bodies.
>>
>> And the DNSO constituencies are biased 6:1 in favor of commerical
>> interests.
>>
>> The ASO and PSO exclude participation by individuals altogether.
>>
>> The At-Large Membership has just been dismembered.
>>
>> The board engages in performance art that they call "open meetings".
>>
>> The board finds consensus to extend its term despite the fact that
>> virtually all comment on the official comment place was against it.
>>
>>                 --karl--
>
>
>
>
>


Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 (212) 924-8800
1 (212) 924-0240 fax
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
http://www.edventure.com                    http://www.icann.org

High-Tech Forum in Europe:  24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
PC Forum: March 12 to 15, 2000, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona 
Book:  "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age" 


Reply via email to