Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] My nose

[Planet Communications Computing Facility]

I see what you mean Karl - ICANN looks like a no win situation.


On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Karl Auerbach wrote:

> 
> > esters making a good suggestion here - if you want input - this is a way.
> > Why dose the idno not join ip in mass.
> 
> Does everybody have a trademark they can claim they own?
> 
> The question that could also be asked is why don't all the people in the
> IP consitituency forced to join the business constituency -- all IP folks
> are in business.  Why should we have a redundant constituency?
> 
> Sure, now a few constituencies may be opening up the doors to a few
> individuals.  A few individual trademark owners may get into the IP
> constituency.
> 
> A few here, a few there, and pretty soon it adds up to dilution and
> powerlessness for individuals.
> 
> Under the ICANN by-laws, anybody can "self-organize" a constituency.  And
> we have.  The IDNO is as valid as the business constituency.  ICANN can
> not pick and chose which it thinks is more important.
> 
>               --karl--
> 
> 
> 
> -
> This message was sent via the IDNO-DISCUSS mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno-discuss" to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information, see http://www.idno.org/
>