Dennis and all, I am glad you were able to get your problem finally addressed properly. >;) It seems that MCI, yet again has several problems that are systemic that they have yet to adequately deal with given the fix that John need to provide for you. This however does not excuse your posts to the DNSO GA list from being archived. So, in essence, and in many SPECIFIC cases, the DNSO is still practicing SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP. This is inconsistent with the DNSO bylaws, the ICANN Bylaws, and with the White Paper. Appalling!! Myself along with several (14) existing DNSO Participants are still CENSORED without notification or any known reason for doing so. This is unexceptable and shows the length that the ICANN and the DNSO will go to. Disgusting!! d3nnis wrote: > My specific complaint was not censorship, but failure to respond to > a problem report. > > The List Administrator had initially made quite an effort, for which I > publicly acknowledged her effort, even to the > extent of arguing against others' censorship charges. Unfortunately, > the matter was dropped, and I was left for over two months with > no response -- which prompted me even to ask Esther Dyson to > look into it. > > This week, John Klensin of MCI spent an enormous amount of time > diagnosing and correcting the problem, for which I am very grateful to > him and MCI. I was in fact running an older version of MCI's mail program > -- probably sent to me because my machine was so stone-age. > John created a custom fix and sent me the diskettes to correct the problem. > > >Dennis Schaefer > > ---------- > > [">" = Javier Rodriguez] > > > > > > b) There is just SILENCE from the board about the Censorship that > > > seems to be disrupting the fairness of the process. > > > > Javier, > > > > Sorry if I have missed some of the discussions, so can you please explain to > > me what exactly this "censorship" is about? > > > > As far as I know, the fact that some of Dennis Schaefer's messages do not > > get archived has already been explained. His messages arrive all with the > > same message ID: > > > > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The archiving software (MHonArc) relies on the message IDs to identify > > messages, so if his mailing client is broken, there is no need to blame > > the board or the DNSO for it. > > > > Is there anything else to this "censorship" issue? > > > > Patricio Poblete > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
