Mikael and all,
I can't speak for Patrick or the DNSO, but I did think that Roelands
suggestion for eliminating this problem and eliviating others level of
paranoia was the best solution I had seen presented to address this
problem. Not only that, but it is used by business everyday. The
problem that might come into play with Roelands proposal, was that it
might effect some participants or the ability for some to participate
that might otherwise be restricted due to jurisdictional use of
Digital authentication, i.e. Digital Certs.
Mikael Pawlo wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > > Fair enough. How about limiting the amount of postings per person
> > > / personality to a maximum of five (5) postings a day?
> > How would that in any way help to eliminate the frauds?
>
> It won't, but since all discussion today is more or less spammed to death
> it would at least make it possible to create a forum where the elimination
> of frauds could be discussed on a broader base. But then again, you could
> easily subscribe 1 000 fake accounts to the different lists and start a
> debate with yourself to destroy the open discussion.
>
> Well, I don't know, but in my opinion the mailinglists are not working
> very well now. Do you have other suggestions on how to regain interest
> from a broader audience for the ongoing discussions?
>
> Mikael
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> ICQ:35638414 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pawlo.com/
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
