Ed, Chuck and all,
Thank you Ed for providing the "Complete Quote" from Chuck.
Chuck, I find it interesting that you seem to find none of this particularly
relevant to the Registry/Retistrar agreement as a problem. But we have been
here before haven't we. As I do respect you as an individual, I must
say I was surprised at this quote. Is the the new NSI line? Or is this
something that was thrust upon NSI through its "Tentative Agreements"
with ICANN and the NTIA? I prefer to believe the latter is the FAQ
here. I may of course be very wrong. But given that we [INEGRoup]
have followed very closely these discussions and debates for several years
now, I think that I am most likely correct in my preference.
All of this of course is extralegal as some may be well aware of,
as the Accreditation Agreement determined or edicted in the
Singapore ICANN conference initially and was not a consensus
decision as required under the White Paper from the NTIA. This
will likely be legally challenged, as I am sure some here suspect.
This in turn could be detrimental to both NSI and any of its
Registrars. The E.Com and Races.com are glaring possible
cases, for example.
Ed Gerck wrote:
> "Gomes, Chuck" wrote:
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > Saying that "the Registry would be of no help unless there is evidence of a
> > violation of the Regigtry/Registrar Agreement" does not mean that I think
> > that is a problem.
>
> Chuck:
>
> Fair enough, how about if I quote you as saying (for completness,
> inserting the text you classified as "this situation"):
>
> "I agree with you that the Registry would be of no help in this situation
> [namely, the facts that the Registrar follows a sales system (Shared
> Registry) that denies tracing the Registry for any customer, denies
> responsibility to the customer from the Registry, denies access to the
> Registry's logs in order to prove customer's rights, keeps the
> property of what is sold with the reseller, gives the customer no
> authority over what was bought, and denies legal recourse as the
> customer may see fit] unless there is evidence of a violation of the
> Registry-Registrar agreement. However, I do not think this is a
> problem." Chuck Gomes.
>
> Is this according to what you want to say? If not, please provide
> the change, if yes then I can comment by return email.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ed Gerck
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
