"William X. Walsh" wrote:
> If Chuck feels his comments need to be placed in context, he can provide his
> own description of the context, that is not from your subjective view point.
Pardon, not subjective at all, William -- my message was sent first and is
archived, as well as Chuck's reply to it. I just mentioned what IS the
context of his remark, quite objectively from the archives.
But, it seems like the quote, in its proper context, is not very much
of your liking. But, so was writen and so was the context. Live with it!
Now, to cite the The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.
Cheers, Ed Gerck
PS: to repeat, the quote is:
> "I agree with you that the Registry would be of no help in this situation
> [namely, the facts that the Registrar follows a sales system (Shared
> Registry) that denies tracing the Registry for any customer, denies
> responsibility to the customer from the Registry, denies access to the
> Registry's logs in order to prove customer's rights, keeps the
> property of what is sold with the reseller, gives the customer no
> authority over what was bought, and denies legal recourse as the
> customer may see fit] unless there is evidence of a violation of the
> Registry-Registrar agreement. However, I do not think this is a
> problem." Chuck Gomes.
