Actually, an alternate root would be one that does not include the "A" root, which would seem infinitely preferable to one that does, which would be an inclusive root, to my way of thinking. Joanna
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Einar Stefferud Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IFWP] Moving Up the Ladder There is no such thing as an alternate inclusive root. The Inclusive root includes all non colliding TLDs, so there is nothing alternate about it...Stef At 7:21 PM -0500 3/17/02, Joanna Lane wrote: >Yeah, right, and they'll call upon UN forces to defend security and >stability of the internet. How long till they criminalize inclusive/ >alternate roots? > >Regards, >Joanna > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Michael Sondow >Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:02 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [IFWP] Moving Up the Ladder > > > >"Richard J. Sexton" wrote: > > > > Moving Up the Ladder > > > > http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-14mar02.htm > > > > "It is further resolved [02.31] that the Chairman of the Board of ICANN >will > > undertake to liaise with the appropriate activities and persons engaged in >UN > > ICT work, keeping alert, always, for opportunities for mutually beneficial >work > > between ICANN and the UN and its various subsidiary organizations;" > > > > Can an office in Geneve be far behind? > >Not necessary. The UN is now just another bureau of the U.S. Gov't, as >witness its activities in ex-Yugoslavia (e.g. sending "UN observers" >picked by the US State Dept. to Kosovo). ICANN will probably end up in >D.C., where the UN is run from. > >M.S.
