|
Thanks… I think he would definitely tolerate
some latency if it saved him $6K. I’ll check HostMySite out. Brad From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Helms I've been somewhat pleased
with HostMySite's shared Sql Servers. Its not ideal, but 6000 versus a
little slower response times, well there is the answer to your question.
How much dependency does the client's application place on speed versus initial
costs? you can always later move to a dedicated server, and the shared
server on HostMySite has been ok for me so far. On 7/24/06, bsd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: I have a client who needs to get a SQL Server database up and
running for his business. He didn't particularly thrill at the idea of
shelling out $6000 for a server license. Does anyone have experience with
a hosted SQL Server provider that they would recommend (or NOT
recommend)? Any pros or cons? Any other options I'm not
considering? Thanks, Brad
|
_______________________________________________ Reply to DFWCFUG: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors: www.HostMySite.com www.teksystems.com/
