Eric
On 10/14/06, AHMED EL-RASHEEDY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Eric,I think it would be a good idea to put the Web Service CFCs to handle security and access to the DAOs and Gateways. And the CFCs for the DAOs and Gateways with limited access (may be package level and accessed from the security CFC that would control access to the package level components only)..Ahmed.
On 10/13/06, Eric Knipp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:_______________________________________________If you've had experience with this - what's your preferred approach?Seems to me that I could just make all the DAO's and Gateways remote, but I am not sure if that is the safest approach.Might it be wiser to design a web services layer to sit between the DAO's and Gateways? If so, should that layer exist for security purposes only, or should it further abstract the data access layer?Thanks,Eric
Reply to DFWCFUG:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
www.HostMySite.com
www.teksystems.com/
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
www.HostMySite.com
www.teksystems.com/
_______________________________________________ Reply to DFWCFUG: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors: www.HostMySite.com www.teksystems.com/
