On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Chris L <c...@viptalk.net> wrote: > It doesn't make sense to me to have the LAN interface in two different > bridge groups. > > If you want LAN, WLAN, and OPT1 in the same bridge, why not put them in one > bridge?
I've been asking myself that very same question now. I had always questioned why I had two bridge interfaces and couldn't figure out why.... I only had one in pfS-1.2.3, so I'm left with the conclusion that the upgrade process did something it shouldn't have. I will go ahead and move it all into one bridge, would this solve my issues of not being able to connect to my wireless though? That is still the larger issue here. > -- > Chris Brennan > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/ > GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
