On 2011-11-29 12:18, David Burgess wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Ugo Bellavance<[email protected]> wrote:
I know, but we didn't want to do any routing because subnets may change and
overlap in the future, since this is two distinct organizations.
I don't see how NAT fixes that. With or without NAT, pfsense needs to
have an interface on both networks, and host that want to talk to the
other network need a route there. How does NAT simplify your setup?
db
You're probably right, especially with SIP. Now that have changed my
mind, I have to convince the other network admin...
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
