On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know, but we didn't want to do any routing because subnets may change and > overlap in the future, since this is two distinct organizations. I don't see how NAT fixes that. With or without NAT, pfsense needs to have an interface on both networks, and host that want to talk to the other network need a route there. How does NAT simplify your setup? db _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
