On 2012.08.14 09.21, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
I have no qualms if its working as intended due to the DHCP service. Like I stated, every other DHCP server I worked with DHCP reservations have to be part of the scope, otherwise you get an error that the reservation assigned is outside its scope, and therefore not under its control.
this sounds more to me like terminology conflation than anything else. the term scope [or subnet in isc dhcpd terms] refers to the "entirety" of a netblock within which dhcp service is offered. it does not refer to a given range of addresses handed out to clients [this is called a pool [or range in isc dhcpd terms]. on flat networks, rarely does a pool consume an entire scope, as there are invariably devices which don't use dhcp. pools don't include reservations - they're defined outside of the pool. i've not seen any dhcp software which deviates from these concepts.
-ben _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
