2012/11/6 Michael Schuh <[email protected]>: > 2012/11/6 Michael Schuh <[email protected]>: >> 2012/11/6 Chris Buechler <[email protected]>: >>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:31 PM, David Brodski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Thank you for the replay, but I it is not working. >>>> >>> >>> There's about 0 chance of that working without source code hacking. >>> You'll need one NIC per IP to do that easily. I'd suggest a real, >>> proper static IP assignment rather than that mess that no packaged >>> firewall solution can properly support without one NIC per IP if your >>> ISP can offer anything different. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> List mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> >> Just an idea (thoughts not fully replayed to end): >> Put some further Nics (as much as macs needed - would be difficult if >> you like to have 16 or more IP's - lol) into the pfSense box. >> Configure Proxy Arp -> you have to manually add a line to >> /boot/loader.conf and into the config as shell cmd. >> iirc it was 'net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1' for loader.conf >> and sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1 as shell cmd. >> >> So you will get the different IP's onto those nics. >> Forward all traffic to (over) those nics to the default gw assigned by your >> ISP. > > Sorry not very precise here: the outgoing traffic routed to 0.0.0.0/0. > >> this, may be will, not work cause of the Bootp/dhcp-requests if you >> have the local dhcp service enabled. >> Not fully sure, but if so dhc-relay can may be help. >> >> And for completeness, its not the securest solution - if it should work. >> >> M.
*doh* as i sayed before - not thought to end: is it not possible and simpler to put further nics from that pfSense on a switch connected to the cable modem? The ISP should than give you a netmask of 32 bits setted back? _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
