Sorry but I can`t see any good point for this. 

PFsense is a well known distribution due to the stability of it`s 
core-components and as a Firewall/Router appliance, not an "all in one" 
distribution. 


There are dozens of linux-based file-server distributions around, even at a 
small-office you can have both PFsense and "younameit" sharing the same 
physical hardware but on separate VMs. 


My $0.02 


Seko 








----- Original Message -----

From: "Luiz Gustavo Costa" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:49:30 AM 
Subject: [pfSense] Samba4 package and extend services with pfsense 

Hi guys ! 

I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a 
domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an 
opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall and act as 
a new service on the network in a new installation in another hardware 
to act as a domain controller in Active Directory with power tools 
native firewall. 


... 
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to