On Sunday, September 15, 2013 07:35:27 PM Jim Pingle wrote: > I agree. From what I have done with Quagga on OSPF, it's > been pretty straightforward and simple and tends to just > work and work well. > > It isn't without its quirks, but I've never been sure if > those are actually quirks in Quagga or the way we > generate configurations for it.
IS-IS in Quagga is very, very broken to the point of not really being usable. We're an IS-IS shop in the backbone, but with Anycast DNS, we've had to run OSPF on DNS servers with Quagga/Zebra, and redistribute that into our IS-IS backbone. I don't know of any decent, non-router implementation of IS- IS at the moment. Then again, corporate networks generally depend on OSPF anyway. OSPFv3 isn't as feature-rich in Quagga as it is in routers, but if you can do away with some of those features, it'll work and inter-op. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
