On Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:21:55 PM Adam Thompson wrote: > I'm thinking that if you need advanced features, go buy a > Cisco/Juniper. But if you need basic (or even just > homogenous) functionality, pfSense ought to be a > good-enough platform. It's really close right now but > not having redistribution is a roadblock, at least for > me. -Adam
As I'd mentioned, our backbone (routers) already run IS-IS. The need for Quagga is for Anycast DNS. I consider HMAC-MD5 authentication in IS-IS a basic requirement, but this is badly broken in Quagga. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
