> On Jan 8, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Seth Mos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bryant Zimmerman schreef op 8-1-2015 om 15:28:
>> We are working on getting our own ASN with ARIN so we can get our own
>> blocks of address.
>> We are doing this because we are using multiple ISP's and want to
>> announce our own addresses, For better fail over.
>
> It's so much nicer then multi-wan, I don't regret it in the least.
>
>> We are currently using pfSense boxes with CARP at both our locations.
>> Will the open BGP package available for pfSense work correctly with --4
>> Byte ASN's
>
> Yes
>
>> --Does carp function correctly with Open BGP for fail over.
>
> You do not want to use CARP with with BGP in any situation. Each node
> needs it's own session with the remote BGP peer. You need to use iBGP
> between the nodes instead.
We run a pair of c2758s behind each link and CARP between these, announcing the
routes out via BGP. (Technically this occurs on a different pair (R200) boxes
that play the role of router (one per link).
We run BIRD on these. It's ... better than OpenBGPD.
>
> Regards,
>
> Seth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
