Adam Thompson schreef op 8-1-2015 om 17:24: > On 15-01-08 10:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: >> To clarify this a bit better. You speak BGP to your ISP from each >> pfSense node and generally use CARP as the router address on the >> internal side. You still need to exchange routes between both pfSense >> nodes. The moment CARP fails over you drop your BGP session anyhow, so >> both pfSense nodes need the routing tables (Unless you use default only). > > Uh... > > https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenBGPD_package > > says it better than I can. Note that there have been a ton of bug-fixes > relating to "set nexthop" and CARP in the last year or so, which don't > appear to have made it into the FreeBSD port yet. > > I run a pair of BGP routers using CARP to an upstream peer who only > wants to configure a single IP address and a single session. Works OK > in practice under OpenBSD, not sure how well the pfSense package > (FreeBSD port) handles it. >
Yep, that's a good reason to use CARP, but you might drop some traffic on reconfiguration depending on the amount of routes you have. Regards, Seth _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
