On 02/10/2015 11:05 PM, Espen Johansen wrote:
A seperator might make sense. But grouping and hiding rules is a bad
idea based on my experience.
A tree structure that is allways collapsed is annoying when you need
overview of all rules.
And defaulting to a expanded look will just act as a seperator.
Imho interface tabs acts as grouping enough. And a seperator line on
floating rules might make sense in some cases.
If one would implement a rule type called "seperator", it could be
highlighted in the view based on its type. I believe that all rules
affecting a interface should be seen in plain view. To me this smells
like you whish for "over engineering".
Just my 2cents.
I guess it would break the current UI to have collapsible groups. And it
might not have been the most thought through proposal :) I do however
still feel there is a use for a separator. With regards to your comment
on "over engineering". "If something is worth doing, it's worth
overdoing" ;)
-kp
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold