On 2/11/2015 6:55 AM, kpolb...@olberg.name wrote: > I guess it would break the current UI to have collapsible groups. And it > might not have been the most thought through proposal :) I do however > still feel there is a use for a separator. With regards to your comment > on "over engineering". "If something is worth doing, it's worth > overdoing" ;)
We get requests for this sort of thing from time to time but a consensus is never reached about what might be possible, useful, and wouldn't make the view worse for others. Typically, though, if a set of rules is so long that they need grouping, they likely are not making good use of aliases. For visually identifying rules without grouping, there is also this bounty thread on the forum that is progressing: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=87494.0;topicseen Jim _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
