On 23/03/2015 14:34, Christopher CUSE wrote:
> 
> On 03/23/2015 03:03 PM, mayak wrote:
>> On 03/22/2015 12:38 AM, Bryan D. wrote:
>>> We've had a pfSense-to-pfSense "always on" IPsec VPN connecting 2
>>> offices since 2008 (pfSense 1.2 IIRC) and it's:
>>> - been ultra reliable (if VPN is down, suspect ISP issue or pfSense
>>> box failure)
>>> - it's been quick to connect (about 1 second, almost unnoticeable)
>>> - it's worked across numerous upgrades without issue (nice!)
>>>
>>> Beginning with pfSense v2, we added multiple P2s at each end (still
>>> same reliability, etc.).
>>>
>>> One of the offices has had its hardware updated and its pfSense
>>> updated to 2.2 then 2.2.1 (after testing to see whether we seemed to
>>> be affected by the "multiple P2 issue" noted in the upgrade page --
>>> we're OK on that one).  This connection has continued to work with
>>> the same characteristics as before.  The 2.2.1 system is 64-bit and
>>> the other end is v2.1.5 32-bit
>>>
>>> We recently added a second site-to-site IPsec VPN, essentially the
>>> same as the existing one except both sides are pfSense v2.2.1 (but
>>> other end is 32-bit) and stronger algorithms are being used and P1 is
>>> set to v2 (supposedly avoiding any "multiple P2" issues).
>> <snip>
>>
>> i have to say that i am also experiencing this. i'm in the process of
>> installing smokeping to prove connectivity is good between the public
>> ip endpoints between various vpns.
>>
>> will report back with those results.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> m
> 
> just got dropped again -- fourth time in last few hours -- something is
> definitely wrong.
> 
> upgraded all my pfsenses to 2.2.1 over the weekend.
> 
We also seem to be having stability issues on our site to site vpn
(2.2.1 one end, 2.0.1 the other, plan was to upgrade soon) its only
stopping once every day or so afaik but it was prety rock solid before I
upgraded the end thats now 2.2.1, looking at adding some monitoring also
just to make sure of end to end connectivity before I investigate further.

Happy to supply more info if it'll help.

Vince

> m
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> 
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to