On 05/01/2016 02:35 AM, Olivier Mascia wrote: >> Le 1 mai 2016 à 04:26, Jim Pingle <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> On 4/30/2016 6:57 AM, Olivier Mascia wrote: >>> Sorry for having asked this question. >>> While I had tried to find the answer before posting, I finally found the >>> answer seconds later. >>> >>> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/IPv6_and_VPNs >>> >>> "Currently IPv6 with IPsec is functional, but traffic cannot be mixed >>> families in a tunnel. Meaning, IPv6 traffic can only be carried inside a >>> tunnel which has IPv6 endpoints, and IPv4 traffic can only be carried over >>> a tunnel using IPv4 endpoints. A single tunnel cannot carry both types of >>> traffic." >> That page is a little out of date in one respect: You can't mix traffic >> with IPsec using IKEv1, but you can with IKEv2. So long as both sides >> support IKEv2 you can carry IPv6 and IPv4 in P2 entries. >> >> FWIW, You can also tunnel both at once using OpenVPN. > I have had a performance issue with OpenVPN recently (though I used OpenVPN a > lot in the past for remote access VPN and some point to point link over slow > links). I started using IPsec for those two new links with higher performance > and the results are excellent. Indeed I configured IKEv2 on both endpoints. > So I should push the experience of adding a second phase2 for tunneling IPv6. > > Thanks ! > What kind of performance issues? Highspeed links? Just wondering.
_______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
