> Le 3 mai 2016 à 11:17, Olivier Mascia <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Le 3 mai 2016 à 09:49, Chris Buechler <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Or would it be that my BACKUP (according to /status_carp.php) do also >>> advertise (which it shouldn't as BACKUP)? >> >> That's the problem. I'm seeing that in some cases and not others with >> IPv6 CARP in 2.3, with no apparent reason as to why. It seems like it >> continues to work fine in that circumstance for me, but that could >> definitely affect switch CAM tables and cause issues like packet loss >> in some environments. I need to look at it closer tomorrow. > > It's a relief to read your comment. :)
Chris, I upgraded the backup from 2.3-REL to 2.3.1-DEVELOPMENT (amd64), built on Thu May 12 23:47:16 CDT 2016. It started working as expected as soon as that one booted after the upgrade. On this backup node, capturing the ff02::12 I'm now *ONLY* seeing those from the master. And I do not suffer anymore (well I hope I'm not speaking too soon, but it is stable for >1 hour now) of the weird effect of some packets choosing to go to the backup instead of the master. Has something been changed/fixed in the current snapshots which would explain this or I'm just running by chance, I do not know. I'll try to understand by reviewing redmine for bug fixes and changes. -- Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Best Regards, Olivier Mascia, integral.be/om _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
