Steve, It currently does 21mbps IPsec (aes-gcm-128), in a lab environment, because there is no driver for the crypto core (yet).
OpenVPN is slightly slower (19 Mbps). It's always strange to see your name on the list. The president of ADI shares your name, so I tend to pay a lot more attention to what you post. Jim > On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's what I'm trying to ask, if the SG-1000 would work for that. > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of A Mohan Rao > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:41 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] SG-1000 and VPN > > better u can use site to site vpn is best solution. > >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:08 AM, WebDawg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We have a client who wants to set up one remote user (in a >>> fixed >>> location) with a hardware VPN connection back to the office. The >>> office has about 5 active PCs at any given time. This would be the >>> only VPN >> user. >>> >>> Has anyone used one of the new micro SG-1000 units with a >>> VPN yet? Either as a remote site or as a SOHO router + VPN host? >>> Just wondering how the ARM CPU would stack up. The specs say 200k >>> active >>> (non-VPN) connections... >>> > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
