Meant to include this: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commits/master?author=loos-br
On Thursday, January 26, 2017, Jim Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adam, > > Given the 21Mbps figure I quoted, 100x (2.1Gbps) would be an unrealistic > expectation. > > Based on the discussion here: https://groups.google. > com/forum/m/#!msg/beagleboard/ZFrCs9ZHCP4/aCNFejgXpxYJ > perhaps 3-4x at 1500 (1420) byte frame sizes, and (as a guess), closer to > 3, given the PPs rates we see without the crypto offload, and the > associated CPU loading. > > Most of the work lately has actually been on the Ethernet driver, which > (good news), we can no longer make fall over at high frame rates. > > Jim > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2017, Adam Thompson <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Jim, >> Asking you to speculate here... >> Assuming someone *is* working on drivers for the chip's crypto >> capabilities, when that finally happens, do you have any notion of how much >> faster IPsec will get? Are we talking 2x or 100x? >> -Adam >> >> >> On January 25, 2017 7:45:49 PM CST, Jim Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Steve, >>> >>> It currently does 21mbps IPsec (aes-gcm-128), in a lab environment, because >>> there is no driver for the crypto core (yet). >>> >>> OpenVPN is slightly slower (19 Mbps). >>> >>> It's always strange to see your name on the list. The president of ADI >>> shares your name, so I tend to pay a lot more attention to what you post. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> That's what I'm trying to ask, if the SG-1000 would work for that. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Steve Yates >>>> ITS, Inc. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of A Mohan >>>> Rao >>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:41 PM >>>> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [pfSense] SG-1000 and VPN >>>> >>>> better u can use site to site vpn is best solution. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:08 AM, WebDawg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a client who wants to set up one remote user (in a >>>>>> fixed >>>>>> location) with a hardware VPN connection back to the office. The >>>>>> office has about 5 active PCs at any given time. This would be the >>>>>> only VPN >>>>>> >>>>> user. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone used one of the new micro SG-1000 units with a >>>>>> VPN yet? Either as a remote site or as a SOHO router + VPN host? >>>>>> Just wondering how the ARM CPU would stack up. The specs say 200k >>>>>> active >>>>>> (non-VPN) connections... >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> pfSense mailing list >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold >>>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> pfSense mailing list >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold >>> >>> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> > _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
