Sounds cool but maybe a bit overkill for what i need ...

Cheers

Respect your privacy and that of others, don't give your data to big 
corporations.
Use alternatives like Signal (https://whispersystems.org/) for your messaging 
or 
Diaspora* (https://joindiaspora.com/) for your social networking.

Il 22/12/2017 22:35, Eero Volotinen ha scritto:
> Well,
>
> Just plug pfsense to ADSL and buy managed switch and some unifi wlan
> aps. You can install proxy on pfsense box also..
>
>
> Eero
>
> 22.12.2017 23.57 "Antonio" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> kirjoitti:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     I'm trying to design an optimal network setting for my home and was
>     wondering what people's thoughts were based on my needs:
>
>     1) Need a single DHCP, DNSMasq server;
>
>     2) want to route traffic through VPNs only on certain parts of my
>     network
>
>     3) want to eventually install a proxy somewhere on the network to
>     route
>     traffic from my kids laptops/tablets.
>
>     4) obviously want to firewall all centrally as best as possible.
>
>     My setup is as follows:
>
>     a) I have a little compact mini PC with four ethernet connections (1x
>     WAN and 3x LAN) - its wifi too
>
>     b) A Netgear Modem onto ADSL
>
>     c) A Netgear router Hawk 7000
>
>     d) a couple of desktop PCs wired to (a) as well as a server
>
>     e) several mobiles, IoTs that connect wireless to (c)
>
>     At the moment the connection is (b)->(c)->(a)->PCs but I feel I'm not
>     getting the best of this setup, particularly pfSense which at the
>     moment
>     is just firewalling my PCs/server.
>
>     I generally consider the wifi network the weak point as guest come and
>     connect to it that's why its connected before (a); traffic from (c)
>     cannot get past (a) but the PCs/server can get out on the internet. I
>     feel that (a) should be connected to (b) and (c) should then be
>     connected to one of the LAN ports on (a), say LAN2 (I would have a
>     switch on LAN1 with PCs/server). I could then use pfSense to route
>     traffic from LAN2 to WAN and firewall LAN1 so that traffic from LAN2
>     could not go to LAN1.
>
>     That way, I could then set up pfSense as my single DHCP and DNSMasq
>     server. I could then set up VPNs for just traffic of LAN1 or LAN2.
>
>     Would you agree with this sort of setup or do you think I could
>     implement things better?
>
>     I look forward to some of your thoughts.
>
>     Best regards
>
>     --
>     Respect your privacy and that of others, don't give your data to
>     big corporations.
>     Use alternatives like Signal (https://whispersystems.org/) for
>     your messaging or
>     Diaspora* (https://joindiaspora.com/) for your social networking.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     pfSense mailing list
>     https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>     <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list>
>     Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
>

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to