Please read the quote by Trin Min-ha on page 40. What do you think about this 
method of discussion? Do you feel this form of dialogue which is essentially 
bobbing and weaving around the issue until by some chance you hit on it can be 
utilized in the academic setting effectively? How does addressing issues this 
way affect the people involved in the discussion? Would it bring more people 
in? 

Sitas calls for a ?sociology that is in dialogue with communities and their 
cultural formations? (41). Can this be achieved? Is this type of dialogue apart 
of your field? How can we apply this idea of dialogue to our own fields of 
study? How do you feel you can utilize this option in your own work?

Sitas talks about how the relationship between producers of knowledge and 
?ordinary folks? needs to be problematised in the South African case (41). How 
do you feel your relationship with ?ordinary folks? has been problematised? Do 
you see yourself as a separate, educated entity or do you see your relationship 
more as Sitas discusses later when he talks about the University no longer 
being the sole producer of knowledge (45)? How does this relate to our 
discussion last week of post-modernism?

Sitas discusses the ?pressure to identify your position or positionality? (44) 
in terms of emancipatory discourse of apartheid. How do you struggle with the 
pressure to identify a position at Macalester? At home with family and friends?

?Much of the sustenance it brings cheap-cheap from the hills and towers of 
knowledge, made of coal or rubber, or the real thing, has in its womb the 
distortions of power: its skills, its professionalized commodified form of 
knowledge embody the most cynical trade between the academy and the poor? (49) 
How have you or objects which hold meaning to you been commodified?  How do you 
think your own experience can help you create dialogue with communities?

How do we keep people?s stories individual while utilizing them for discussion? 
(we sort of talked about this the week before last so try and think back) How 
do you choose to create dialogue? How do you create dialogue and utilize the 
individual voice while not marginalizing other voices?

Sitas says that parables are a humble part of the knowledge generating process 
(50). What parables have been passed on to you? How have they affected your 
thinking or reasoning process? How do you use them in dialogue with others?





_______________________________________________
Mellon Myers Undegraduate Fellowship Program at Macalester (http://macmmuf.org)
[email protected]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
http://macmmuf.org/mailman/listinfo/list_macmmuf.org

Reply via email to