[REBOL] Re: Encouraging functional programming Re:(10)

[ejolson]

Hello, 
On 29-Nov-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The fault is with my hasty description, not with the timings. (I'm also
> running 2.2.0.3.1, which was used for the actual timings above on a
> 90MHz Pentium.)  ...

And here I thought all you serious Windows users were keeping up on the
hottest machines (Windows 3000 on 50GHz Pentium 5).  ;)

Elliott
2.2.0.1.1 on 40MHz 68030 and '040