[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (WinNT) (Amiga v. tomorrow...)
>
> What exactly is the relationship between Core and View?
View is /Core + GUI
> The latest View beta (nice installer!) creates a REBOL folder with a View folder
> inside it.
> Should Core reside in a "Core" folder in the same REBOL folder? ie., since I
> installed Core manually, I'll move it from it's current location and fix any
> shortcuts, etc. Does View encapsulate all the Core functionality? If not, why
> are the EXEs named the same?
Yes, /View encapsulateds Core functionality. Noone answered the question so far if
there is going to be just one /Core .exe and other rebol "components", or RT will
take another aproach and each product (/Command, /View, etc.) will contain /Core +
additional components. Me and probably also others would like to see just one .exe -
/Core - the kernel, as in the other case we are risking incompatibilities, as we can
see nowadays ... standalone /Core development doesn't keep up to /View for more than
several months ...
What is missing more is - link between /View and /Command capabilities :-) But let
REBOL folks have their time to take the right decision for the future ...
> Are the scripts that I downloaded while installing
> View the same ones that I got from www.rebol.com when I installed Core?
Yes, they are the same. But in addition, current library set contains also scripts
for /View ...
> What
> about the documentation?
Go to http://www.rebol.com/developers.html , there're links to various docs
available ..
Have a nice day,
-pekr-
>
> etc. etc. etc.
>
> --
> Pete Wason|"LWATPLOTG"|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|CUCUG|TA|PHX
>
> Get a cool electronic checking account at:
> https://preview.x.com/new_account.asp?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
