Yes. View is built on Core.
Currently, however, the Core used with View is 6 months beyond that provided by the
2.2 Core on our web site. It is our desire to fix that with a 2.3 release. But, if
you need a more advanced (and bug fixed) Core, use View.
I have not used Core for several months... As View does all Core functions plus more.
-Carl
At 6/2/00 11:12 AM -0400, you wrote:
>(WinNT) (Amiga v. tomorrow...)
>
>What exactly is the relationship between Core and View?
>
>The latest View beta (nice installer!) creates a REBOL folder with a View folder
>inside it.
>Should Core reside in a "Core" folder in the same REBOL folder? ie., since I
>installed Core manually, I'll move it from it's current location and fix any
>shortcuts, etc. Does View encapsulate all the Core functionality? If not, why
>are the EXEs named the same? Are the scripts that I downloaded while installing
>View the same ones that I got from www.rebol.com when I installed Core? What
>about the documentation?
>
>etc. etc. etc.
>
>
>
>--
>Pete Wason|"LWATPLOTG"|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|CUCUG|TA|PHX
>
>Get a cool electronic checking account at:
>https://preview.x.com/new_account.asp?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
