Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 16-Giu-00, you wrote:
j> Just a thought.... most of the "philosophical" questions /
j> discussions here about i.e. object lifecycle, scope, bindings,
j> etc. would be simply, formally, and workably solved if Rebol
j> had a true lexical scoping model. As it is, it's sort of the
If you by lexical scoping intend that of C/C++ etc. (I'm not very
familiar with language theory terms), then I vote AGAINST that.
REBOL's static binding is FAR more powerful (and simple!) than
lexical scoping.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/
