Joel wrote: > > Ladislav's comes next (this is the second script he posted; the first one blew up on my box repeatedly). Ladislav wrote: > Confused, I expected the SECOND script (the script using Hash! datatype) to blow up - it looked to me like RT didn't succeed to implement of Hash! datatype reliably, or like there was another sign of the GC bug... Are you thinking of the "sort-of bug" in objects where hash! datatypes, like sub-objects, aren't copied? Andrew Martin ICQ: 26227169 http://members.ncbi.com/AndrewMartin/ http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/ -><-
- [REBOL] Re: Small admin/report benchmark g . santilli
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re: lmecir
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:... jeff
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark... joel . neely
- [REBOL] DIALECT IN REBOL: why a... youpi . technologies
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:... lmecir
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark... jeff
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the second ... lmecir
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Re: a GC bug of the... blazs
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... ptretter
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... lmecir
- [REBOL] a GC bug of the sec... jsc
