Richard Czeiger wrote:
> Hi Paul and Micky :o)
>
> I would think that the textual description of the product/item would
> be the primary <dt> - at the top of the list.
> If the image were a <dt> (and I think there's a case that can be made
> for this) then it would be a secondary <dt>.
>
> Micky, I'm not sure about putting the image in the <dd> used for the
> description.
> I think the image should be given it's own <dd> or <dt>.
> My thinking on this one is based on the examples put forward by Russ
> in his discussion on DLs
> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/definition/
>
> I'd be interested to see if he could come up with the cleanest CSS
> using the following code - and yes, Russ, I'm throwing down the
> gauntlet :o)
> The original mock-up is here: www.grafx.com.au/wip/productList.gif
> Remembering the aim is to come up with some CSS that is fairly
> flexible in terms of the text length (multiple lines) and the
> dimensions of the image. PS: of course, if you can figure out a way
> to get rid of the class="image", that would be even better!
Richard,
If there are no other images than these, then why not using:
dt img {blahblahblah}
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
