On 4/21/06 2:04 AM "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> I don't know what you have in mind here, unless it's related to coding - > semantics, correct structure, etc. Certainly I think it would be wrong to > exemplify on the basis of design itself - colours etc, as this is purely a > matter of opinion. (accessibility apart, of course). Some folk like clutter, > some like empty, some like garish, some like subtle - it goes on and on. It's > very important to distinguish between bad coding (which we can discuss) and > bad design (which is often purely a matter of taste). (You have to avoid the > fanatics jumping in with their favourite hobby-horse!) > > I dare say you already had this approach in mind, but it's worth putting my > 2p's worth in. And why not just teach the "correct" (whatever they are) coding methods? Why linger on with the "incorrect" coding methods? I find fault with the premise of the question. Fwiw (probably less than 2p) ;-) Rick ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
