Lachlan Hardy wrote:
Hi Kat!
Gday Lachlan!:)
Katrina wrote:
From my reading of the spec, Level 3 compliance requires a
sign-language intrepreter (1.2.5), extended audio descriptions (1.2.6),
AND a full multimedia text alternative including any interaction (1.2.7)
for any pre-recorded multimedia
This email has a chronological experience.
May I ask where that 'and' comes from? I can't find it in the spec :(
If I could improve this spec, I would make it clearer just how much
(many criterions) you need to pass before you can claim compliancy for
that level. If you need to pass all criterions or if not, which ones.
OK I got it!!
It's at Conformance Levels and the Baseline
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/conformance.html#conformance-reqs
OK, so what the heck did that little note <em>mean</em>?
The note under conformance seems to suggest as little as zero or one
criterion.
Oh OK! I understand, that note says that you need to pass zero or one
techniques <em>per</em> criterion.
Thank you for clearing that up!:))
I feel better about the WCAG 2.0 now :)
Kat
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
