Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Of course I know "id" is valid. Remember, it's me who suggested up in this
thread to use both in a named anchor ;)
The issue is not about the attributes but their value; and in the example I
wrote, the validator would choke on the ID's *value*. Because "1st_Section"
is a valid value for the name attribute but it is *not* for the id
attribute.
Oh, I see. Yes, of course. I misunderstood you. Sorry about that.
So to use your example:
<hN id="1st_Section">...</hN> would not validate and would not be backward
compatible.
OK. Make it <hN id="first_section">..</hN> then. ;)
// Kalle Räisänen.
--
We have become so accustomed to our illusions that we mistake them
for reality. We demand them. And we demand that there always be more of
them, bigger and better and more vivid.
-- Daniel Boorstin, The Image.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
