Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do wonder about things such as adequate link separation
"[...] What do you mean? [...]"
I noted character separation in the examples and wasn't sure how that'd pan
out in relation to a single image. Wondering if I'd have to hide those and
such.
> and assistive technology support.
"[...] All modern AT should support them just fine. [...]"
Good. I wanted to confirm that wasn't going to throw up some barrier. Like I
said, I know little of the map element.
> I feel comfortable offering these hotspots
> in the form of a list of links, but the "Map" element, by virtue of its
> name, seems like it might carry a lot of weight.
"[...] What weight? Map is designed to describe areas of an image. It
basically does what you're doing with CSS positioning, but by using semantic
elements that describe the image. [...]"
Sorry. International readership. By weight I mean importance, as in an
element with a high semantic value.
> Not sure if it would be in the right direction though.
"[...] Why not? [...]"
Mainly because when I wrote that the questions above hadn't yet been
answered. :-)
Mike
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
