|
Thanks Jim,
As a very uniformed builder of a few sites, I
really have no understanding as to what is good and or bad. My experience has
been, if it works, validates and offers no tidy warnings.............well then
it's fair game to utilize.
Ok to utilize if one does not care or is blissfully
aware that those in the know are shaking their heads at the code.
lol, I'm glad I don't ever ask for a critic of my
code, I think I would prefer to remain ignorant.
Sharron
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:13
AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded Corners
I have not been following this thread so much so bare with me
here! If I am totally in left field ignore me. =)
I cannot speak
for Patrick, but what I think that he is shaking his head at is the class
names, the amount of class names, and markup that lacks semantic value.
I realize that the classnames are used purely for example here, but it leads
us on sort of a painful ride when it is seen.
Jim
On 7/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
Patrick
if you don't mind my asking, Why do you shake your head at
this? Is
the good, bad or what?
I tried this on my
xhtml strict page. It passes validation but generates
several warnings
for nested emphasis and empty trimmings.
As I try dislike my pages to
have errors or warnings of any kind, I won't
use this bit of
code.
However I was curious as to your remark --all I can say
is...wow *shakes
head*
Sharron
> Looking at the required
markup
>
> <div>
> <b class="spiffy">
>
<b class="spiffy1"><b></b></b>
> <b
class="spiffy2"><b></b></b>
> <b
class="spiffy3"></b>
> <b class="spiffy4"></b>
> <b class="spiffy5"></b>
> </b> <div
class="spiffy_content">
> <!-- Your Content Goes Here
-->
> </div>
> <b class="spiffy">
> <b
class="spiffy5"></b>
> <b
class="spiffy4"></b>
> <b
class="spiffy3"></b>
> <b
class="spiffy2"><b></b></b>
> <b
class="spiffy1"><b></b></b>
> </b>
>
</div>
>
> all I can say is...wow *shakes
head*
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
--
______________________________________
"Bugs
are, by definition, necessary.
Just ask Microsoft!"
www.co.sauk.wi.us (Work)
www.arionshome.com (Personal)
www.freexenon.com
(Consulting)
______________________________________
Take Back the Web
with Mozilla Fire Fox
http://www.getfirefox.com
Making a
Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards
http://www.maccaws.org/
Web
Standards Project
http://www.webstandards.org/
Web
Standards Group
http://www.webstandardsgroup.org/
Guild
of Accessible Web Designers
http://www.gawds.org/
******************************************************
The discussion
list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
to the list & getting
help
******************************************************
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.0.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date:
7/24/2006
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
|
