Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> To be picky, again: if you called the class
> "indent" though you wouldn't be describing
> *what* you're classing
I hear you and I'll concede. That was a quick-quick response. But the same
could be said of "first" (to get picky)... First what, etc? But regardless,
I understand what you mean. I name divs as "header," "footer," "content,"
"navigation," etc., so we're thinking the same way. I would come up with
something that meant something to me and that made sense. "Indent" really
wasn't bad, though. In the CSS it would have been written as #description
p.indent { } which really is quite telling as to what it is, where it is,
and what it's for. Agreed?
Mike
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************