Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
    > To be picky, again: if you called the class
    > "indent" though you wouldn't be describing
    > *what* you're classing

I hear you and I'll concede. That was a quick-quick response. But the same 
could be said of "first" (to get picky)... First what, etc? But regardless, 
I understand what you mean. I name divs as "header," "footer," "content," 
"navigation," etc., so we're thinking the same way. I would come up with 
something that meant something to me and that made sense. "Indent" really 
wasn't bad, though. In the CSS it would have been written as #description 
p.indent { } which really is quite telling as to what it is, where it is, 
and what it's for. Agreed?

Mike


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to