RE: img.left, img.right
Designer wrote:
> 1) It's clear what it's for (semantic?)
I do the same thing for embedded images and I would think that this is okay
and finding another way would be a challenge. But I'll take a stab at it
since I've been enlightened on this a bit.
img.posA {} for left (or whatever if it were to be changed down the
road)
img.posB {} for right (same)
img.posC {} for centered (same)
Like so:
a img, img.posA, img.posB, img.posC {
background-color : #fff;
border : 0;
}
img.posA {
float : left;
margin : 0 15px 5px 0;
}
img.posB {
float : right;
margin : 0 0 5px 15px;
}
img.posC {
margin : 5px auto;
}
The class refers to a position (pos) or primary class function, this is
unlikely to change. The only change would be the position's definition. That
would be written in an open-ended fashion using A, B, C.
That said, for my clients, using .left, .right, .center will be more
intuitive.
Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
http://green-beast.com/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
